- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Could Hillary's Iraq War Vote Cost Her The Nomination Again?
Posted on 3/3/14 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 3/3/14 at 7:02 pm
Former Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer (D) seems to think so.
LINK /
Here's a video clip of Schweitzer's speech.
LINK
Here's a video clip of Hillary's infamous 2003 war speech.
LINK
Not only will Hillary have to worry about a Democrat hitting her over the head with her Iraq war vote in the primaries, but I'm sure Rand Paul won't be bashful about borrowing from Obama's 2008 playbook as soon as she throws her hat in the ring.
quote:
Former Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer went to Iowa Wednesday night. And, as he has a knack for doing, he made news.
"I didn’t vote for that war, and I didn’t think it was a good idea," Schweitzer said of Iraq. "George Bush got a bunch of Democrats to go to that war, I was just shaking my head in Montana."
There's, of course, only one Democrat who voted for "that war" who is thinking about running for president in 2016: Hillary Clinton. Schweitzer and everyone else in the audience -- and the broader political world -- knew who he meant. In case you missed that, he added this gem: "Gosh, we had Bush, Bush, Bush and Clinton, Clinton and now we’re talking about a Bush or a Clinton again and I think in America we’re always looking for leadership that takes us to the future and we’re not often looking in the rear view mirror for our leadership."
There's a very clear reason that Schweitzer targeted Clinton. He knows that no matter how big a frontrunner Clinton is in the 2016 race, there will always be a desire on the liberal left to get behind a candidate who isn't part of the D.C. political establishment. If that candidate isn't Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren -- and she has given every indication it won't be -- then, Schweitzer figures, why shouldn't it be him? ("Why not me" is a surprisingly common reason for running for offices.)
After all, he gave a very well-received speech -- sporting a bolo tie! -- at the 2008 Democratic National Convention, left office after two terms as governor of Montana with sky-high approval ratings and has become a favorite son among the liberal left. He's also remarkably charismatic -- we first came across Schweitzer when he ran against then Sen. Conrad Burns in 2000 -- with a sort of everyman appeal that Gov. Chris Christie has turned into political gold in New Jersey.
LINK /
Here's a video clip of Schweitzer's speech.
LINK
Here's a video clip of Hillary's infamous 2003 war speech.
LINK
Not only will Hillary have to worry about a Democrat hitting her over the head with her Iraq war vote in the primaries, but I'm sure Rand Paul won't be bashful about borrowing from Obama's 2008 playbook as soon as she throws her hat in the ring.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 7:16 pm to trackfan
MSNBC contributor - that'll really give him a boost.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 7:48 pm to trackfan
One would think her professional record that amount to absolute T total shite would cost her a nomination. Or maybe it would be her track record as appointed Secretary of State during Obama's first term. Or possibly all of the secrets in the Clinton closet could derail her dreams. Maybe it could be the fact that there is not a woman on earth that is capable of being the leader of the free world and would never be taken seriously on a global scene.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 7:58 pm to trackfan
quote:Not a chance. Other issues might though.
Could Hillary's Iraq War Vote Cost Her The Nomination Again?
Posted on 3/3/14 at 8:00 pm to trackfan
quote:
desire on the liberal left to get behind a candidate who isn't part of the D.C. political establishment. If that candidate isn't Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren
wait - are people serious about wanting this ignorant liar to run for POTUS ???
seriously ???
Posted on 3/3/14 at 8:06 pm to trackfan
quote:
Could Hillary's Iraq War Vote Cost Her The Nomination Again?
Nope.
Age and her health is becoming a huge factor, especially her health.
IF she runs, the left will be fawning all over her, tellings us how she is the 'smartest' woman in the world.
The left doesn't really care about her vote on Eye-rack. They hated Bush with a purple passion(and still do).
Look at the current dufus in the WH. He said he was gonna shut down Gitmo ASAP. Well, its still open. I doubt it will ever be shut-down.
It was all smoke and mirrors from the left.
It always is. Nothin has changed with them.
It was never about Iraq, it was about a man with an R behind his name in the WH.
Blee-dat.
Posted on 3/21/14 at 8:59 pm to trackfan
Chris Matthews is starting to sour on neocon Hillary. Check out this video:
LINK
Her Iraq war vote cost her the nomination in 2008, but obviously she hasn't learned anything since then. Either that, or she's so arrogant that she thinks she can just ignore the Democratic base to prove how "tough" she is. Wouldn't it be funny if her foreign policy positions cost her the White House again, but instead of being attacked from the left by Democrat Barack Obama, she's attacked from the left by the Republican Rand Paul? I think it would serve her right.
LINK
Her Iraq war vote cost her the nomination in 2008, but obviously she hasn't learned anything since then. Either that, or she's so arrogant that she thinks she can just ignore the Democratic base to prove how "tough" she is. Wouldn't it be funny if her foreign policy positions cost her the White House again, but instead of being attacked from the left by Democrat Barack Obama, she's attacked from the left by the Republican Rand Paul? I think it would serve her right.
This post was edited on 3/21/14 at 9:31 pm
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:12 pm to trackfan
It is so funny that the way they avoid someone with flaws in their track record is to vote for someone with no track record at all. While I don't care for Clinton either the logic of voting for Obama because he didn't make Clinton's Iraq vote is just stupid.
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:24 pm to trackfan
Anyone considering her as President needs to think about the meaning of this term:
Commander in Chief
Commander in Chief
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:42 pm to trackfan
If Hilary wins I just picture Bill pulling up to the White House, leaning over to secret service saying
"I keep getting older, they stay the same age"
"I keep getting older, they stay the same age"
This post was edited on 3/21/14 at 9:54 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News