Started By
Message
locked post

Even if innocent, gov can take your ability to defend yourself

Posted on 2/26/14 at 9:27 pm
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68241 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 9:27 pm
Another incredibly bad decision by SCOTUS.

What is the point of innocent until proven guilty if they can strip your financial ability to defend yourself?

quote:

Justice for Kelli and Brian Kaley, the Supreme Court held Tuesday, is of the Alice in Wonderland variety: First comes the punishment—the seizure of all their assets—then the trial, and the crime last of all. “But suppose they never committed the crime?” Alice asks. “It doesn’t matter,” comes the court’s answer, “because a grand jury said so.”


quote:

With charges looming, the Kaleys sought an estimate from their lawyers of how much mounting a defense would cost. The answer: $500,000. (That figure may seem high, but sadly the government agreed it was reasonable.) The Kaleys took out a home equity loan and used the $500,000 to purchase a certificate of deposit, which they planned to spend on lawyers.

The Kaleys have tried only to keep the assets they want to use to pay for a lawyer.
Then came the grand jury indictment and with it a nasty surprise: an order freezing essentially all their assets, including the CD that was meant to pay their legal bills. The only assets exempt from the order—Kelli’s retirement account and their children’s college funds—weren’t enough to cover the $500,000 estimate. And if the Kaleys liquidated those funds, they’d have owed $183,500 in tax penalties. The bottom line: They could no longer pay for their lawyer of choice even though, as the government agreed, that’s what the Sixth Amendment right to counsel protects.



Kaley v. U.S.
This post was edited on 2/26/14 at 9:44 pm
Posted by Voorhies7
Rounding 3rd
Member since Oct 2012
5591 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 9:28 pm to
Damn
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67214 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 9:29 pm to
Couldn't they still get appointed council?
Posted by tigerbaittrick
Member since Jan 2010
7265 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 9:38 pm to
Whoa. This is brutal.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84893 posts
Posted on 2/26/14 at 9:40 pm to
that is a really bad decision IMO
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 3:27 pm to
A fricking 6-3 decision at that, with Breyer, Sotomayor and... Roberts as dissenters.
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 3:46 pm to
Civil Forfeiture is a huge racket.

you have no rights because the civil case is actually against the property. So good luck.

This case is bad because it keeps power in a grand jury, which is basically the DA's puppet. Somebody once said a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29435 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 3:53 pm to
I'm a little surprised and encouraged that everyone here seems to be against this.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58194 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 4:49 pm to
"We have seen the enemy and the enemy is us!"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram