- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Man dead after refusing to show police ID
Posted on 3/6/14 at 1:56 pm to goatmilker
Posted on 3/6/14 at 1:56 pm to goatmilker
quote:
In the theater incident the police did not know who committed the domestic violence when they arrived at the scene and began questioning the father as a suspect.
He can't be suspect if as you say
That's my question. So cops show up to a theater after hearing of a domestic dispute but they don't know who did it and they can question this guy as a "suspect"? frick. They obviously didn't even have a description cause the perp was a WOMAN.
I mean frick. If that's this guy's definition of "reasonable suspicion" and that's his idea of a good suspect ID, then yeah........bull shite.
quote:Yeah. He appears to be saying that no description = no problem. EVERYONE"S a suspect then!!!
They did not have a description of the father so that makes no sense.
Posted on 3/6/14 at 4:54 pm to SettleDown
quote:
That's my question. So cops show up to a theater after hearing of a domestic dispute but they don't know who did it and they can question this guy as a "suspect"? frick. They obviously didn't even have a description cause the perp was a WOMAN.
When the police arrived on the scene the family was pointed out to them as the people involved in the domestic violence incident so the police confronted the father because they wanted to find out what happened.
Sounds reasonable to me.
quote:
I mean frick. If that's this guy's definition of "reasonable suspicion" and that's his idea of a good suspect ID, then yeah........bull shite.
I'm using the legal definition of "reasonable suspicion".
What bullshite definition of "reasonable suspicion" are you using?
quote:
Yeah. He appears to be saying that no description = no problem. EVERYONE"S a suspect then!!!
bullshite.
I'm explicitly saying that the police had a reasonable suspicion that the father was involved in the domestic violence incident because he was pointed out as being one of the members of the family that had the domestic violence incident.
Damn, I'm having another bowl of Strawberry Cheeescake ice cream.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News