- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wells Fargo Employee Fired for Carrying Concealed Handgun
Posted on 2/23/14 at 7:43 pm to bapple
Posted on 2/23/14 at 7:43 pm to bapple
quote:
Why do companies continue to think that forcefully disarming everyone will prevent bad things from happening? Does it have something to do with insurance liability?
If anyone is injured because an armed employee uses or attempts to use a gun, the company will be liable. A disarmed employee may get slaughtered, but he won't cause harm that leads to a lawsuit. Unless a disarmed employee gets hurt or killed and then sues the employer for disarming them, the incentive will always be for the employer to disarm the employee.
This post was edited on 2/23/14 at 7:45 pm
1
Posted on 2/23/14 at 7:46 pm to Coach in Waiting
quote:
If anyone is injured because an armed employee uses or attempts to use a gun, the company will be liable. A disarmed employee may get slaughtered, but he won't cause harm that leads to a lawsuit. Unless a disarmed employee gets hurt or killed and then sues the employer for disarming them, the incentive will always be for the employer to disarm the employee.
Yep, the employee(s) may be dead, but they wont be coming back to file suit.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News