- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lets have an open and rhetoric free discussion about Executive Power
Posted on 2/19/14 at 6:07 am to Mike da Tigah
Posted on 2/19/14 at 6:07 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
They did not want a king. Or one who looked, talked, walked, or acted like he was one.
Do you even Hamilton, bro?
He wanted to make to Washington king.
Also, Adams wanted to make the executive branch hereditary. Kind of like a monarchy.
Hamilton wrote part of that thing, I think it was called the Federalist Papers.....so he was pretty important with the whole "founding fathers/ framers" kind of thing.
1
Posted on 2/19/14 at 7:09 am to CherryGarciaMan
quote:
Do you even Hamilton, bro?
Were Hamilton's views on governance ultimately rejected or accepted ? In other words, did the President become King?
If the answer is "No", then, perhaps you should consider that Alexander Hamilton is not the most important "idea man" amongst our early thinkers on governance.
As for John Adams's idea about the hereditary Executive Branch, it's clear that this idea was also soundly rejected.
ON a more important note: I would like to give praise to this thread. It's important for us to analyze and understand this topic.
This post was edited on 2/19/14 at 7:15 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News