Started By
Message

re: Lets have an open and rhetoric free discussion about Executive Power

Posted on 2/18/14 at 9:33 pm to
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
58928 posts
Posted on 2/18/14 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

There's a good reason for that because the framers obviously could not foresee so couldn't possibly answer all the questions that have arisen over the years.


One thing I know about our framers with complete certainty, and all rhetoric aside...

They did not want a king. Or one who looked, talked, walked, or acted like he was one.




This post was edited on 2/18/14 at 9:35 pm
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84885 posts
Posted on 2/18/14 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

One thing I know about our framers with complete certainty, and all rhetoric aside...

They did not want a king.



Well okay but could you unpack that a little bit?
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
12391 posts
Posted on 2/18/14 at 10:15 pm to
I believe Bush made some serious long term errors in ratcheting up the use of EO's and I fear in today's hyper partisan state, the true damage is clouded. Constantly painting people into corners based on single topics , even within parties. People are portrayed in single topic snippets and not on a collective ideal.

All this will continue to lead presidents to work singular topics as congress is thrown into different directions and mostly afraid of being pinned as something different from expected. I hope this can be addressed through the next election, democrat or republican. I hope the winner promises and keeps his/ her word in the matter but our current president unfortunately has proven it's not a topic most consider important or one the media feels needs much attention, even with the promise.
Posted by CherryGarciaMan
Sugar Magnolia
Member since Aug 2012
2497 posts
Posted on 2/19/14 at 6:07 am to
quote:

They did not want a king. Or one who looked, talked, walked, or acted like he was one.



Do you even Hamilton, bro?

He wanted to make to Washington king.

Also, Adams wanted to make the executive branch hereditary. Kind of like a monarchy.

Hamilton wrote part of that thing, I think it was called the Federalist Papers.....so he was pretty important with the whole "founding fathers/ framers" kind of thing.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram