- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lets have an open and rhetoric free discussion about Executive Power
Posted on 2/18/14 at 9:33 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 2/18/14 at 9:33 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
There's a good reason for that because the framers obviously could not foresee so couldn't possibly answer all the questions that have arisen over the years.
One thing I know about our framers with complete certainty, and all rhetoric aside...
They did not want a king. Or one who looked, talked, walked, or acted like he was one.
This post was edited on 2/18/14 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 2/18/14 at 9:35 pm to Mike da Tigah
quote:
One thing I know about our framers with complete certainty, and all rhetoric aside...
They did not want a king.
Well okay but could you unpack that a little bit?
Posted on 2/18/14 at 10:15 pm to Mike da Tigah
I believe Bush made some serious long term errors in ratcheting up the use of EO's and I fear in today's hyper partisan state, the true damage is clouded. Constantly painting people into corners based on single topics , even within parties. People are portrayed in single topic snippets and not on a collective ideal.
All this will continue to lead presidents to work singular topics as congress is thrown into different directions and mostly afraid of being pinned as something different from expected. I hope this can be addressed through the next election, democrat or republican. I hope the winner promises and keeps his/ her word in the matter but our current president unfortunately has proven it's not a topic most consider important or one the media feels needs much attention, even with the promise.
All this will continue to lead presidents to work singular topics as congress is thrown into different directions and mostly afraid of being pinned as something different from expected. I hope this can be addressed through the next election, democrat or republican. I hope the winner promises and keeps his/ her word in the matter but our current president unfortunately has proven it's not a topic most consider important or one the media feels needs much attention, even with the promise.
Posted on 2/19/14 at 6:07 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
They did not want a king. Or one who looked, talked, walked, or acted like he was one.
Do you even Hamilton, bro?
He wanted to make to Washington king.
Also, Adams wanted to make the executive branch hereditary. Kind of like a monarchy.
Hamilton wrote part of that thing, I think it was called the Federalist Papers.....so he was pretty important with the whole "founding fathers/ framers" kind of thing.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News