re: Could a generally unbiased news network be created?

Heck, I...'Fair and balanced' only in that the network offers rebuttal time to the Conservative opposition. The Network was formed to COUNTER and be the ONLY MSM Network that didn't tow the Liberal bias in what the report, and more importantly, what they don't/won't.

The old 'Hannity and Colmbes' show was indicative of the founding principle...but I reckon the market viewership got annoyed at Colmbes idealist diatribes, and spin/obfuscation. So they rejected Colmbs (his pov), in order to fill that important time with hammering the monopoly (Authoritarian Socialist) opposition. It worked great.

Just curious...I use the term 'Authoritarian Socialist' a lot, to describe what I view the Progressive movement to be; does anybody dispute or reject that descriptor as being accurate? Especially a Leftist? I reckon 'Fascist' (State control of private enterprise) might be more correct.