Started By
Message

re: LSU is as good as or a BETTER option than Texas A&M for a top WR.

Posted on 2/8/14 at 2:09 pm to
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 2:09 pm to
Honestly, this thread does nothing but feed the TAMU fans.

It does us no good. I understand your thoughts, but it will just attract a lot of TAMU trolls.
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
5581 posts
Posted on 2/8/14 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Honestly, this thread does nothing but feed the TAMU fans.

It does us no good. I understand your thoughts, but it will just attract a lot of TAMU trolls.
I hear you. However, in the land of sports, some memes spread like wildfire without much analysis. The idea that a top WR should go to Texas A&M rather than LSU is just one of them. The myth that a wide open offense helps a top WR's production is . . . a myth. In CCC's system, LSU's top WR had more receptions than A&M's top WR. LSU's top two WRs had more receptions, yards, and TDs than A&M's top two WRs.

A wide open offense like Sumliin's helps the bottom rung receivers. They get more targets, more yards, more TDs. So if a player plans to be a bottom rung receiver, he should go to A&M.

There's no reason for a top WR to go to A&M over LSU. But there are a lot of reasons for a top WR to go to LSU over A&M.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram