re: TX Grand Jury Refuses To Indict Homeowner Defending House From Thug POS

quote:

---

Didn't think that was possible.

---

Neither did I 'til I read the article. They don't explain how (and I wouldn't expect the reporter to know how).

To be clear, the defense attorney for the shooter said they were legally owned, but the original warrant said there were "possibly" stolen guns and I'm figuring if they were actually illegally owned that he wouldn't have gotten off the hook. The article would have definitely said they were illegally owned if they were

edit: Basically the prosecution didn't contradict the claim that they were legally owned, and I don't think they'd have been that inept in investigating the legality of the gun ownership if the original warrant suggested they might be illegally owned. So I'm assuming they were in fact legally owned