- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Healthcare costs and tort reform - crushing your myths
Posted on 2/2/14 at 3:04 pm to Taxing Authority
Posted on 2/2/14 at 3:04 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
It's almost impossible to get a valid number. It's too intertwined with insurance. If a patient doesn't NEED an MRI of their head, but... since 1) they aren't paying and 2) it lowers the chance of getting sued -- why would you NOT order as a doctor? There are almost no visible consequences to the doctor nor patient.
But let's not forget that doctors can be assholes on their own without the consideration of litigation.
Take away #2 and the doctor still has an incentive to do an MRI
In fact I was given a CAT scan once and I'm almost certain that it wouldn't have been done if I didn't have insurance. It was completely unnecessary in retrospect.
Posted on 2/2/14 at 3:06 pm to Powerman
quote:
But let's not forget that doctors can be assholes on their own without the consideration of litigation.
quote:Yet I am guessing you didn't call the a-hole out on it.
In fact I was given a CAT scan once and I'm almost certain that it wouldn't have been done if I didn't have insurance. It was completely unnecessary in retrospect.
Posted on 2/2/14 at 3:12 pm to Powerman
quote:I'm not sure I'd characterize an over zealous doc and a-hole.
But let's not forget that doctors can be assholes on their own without the consideration of litigation.
quote:Absolutely. Third party payors are the ultimate cost driver. But practicing defensive medicine is WAY easier when neither the doc nor the patient is paying. It's a strong enabler.
Take away #2 and the doctor still has an incentive to do an MRI In fact I was given a CAT scan once and I'm almost certain that it wouldn't have been done if I didn't have insurance.
quote:Any negative finding looks unnecessary in hindsight.
It was completely unnecessary in retrospect.
Posted on 2/2/14 at 3:24 pm to Powerman
If that doc didn't do the catscan and something bad happened to you.....law suit. Docs get less than 5 percent of the total healthcare dollars.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News