Started By
Message

re: Gordon for Boozer rumor

Posted on 1/23/14 at 8:38 am to
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15316 posts
Posted on 1/23/14 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Gordon rather than amnestying Boozer


Would Benson be willing to pay $17M for Boozer to go away this offseason? If so, it may work, but you would basically be paying $18M to make Gordon go away. I just don't see that being a sound decision.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61645 posts
Posted on 1/23/14 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Would Benson be willing to pay $17M for Boozer to go away this offseason?


No. Only Chicago can amnesty Boozer. We'd probably be hoping to flip him as an expiring next year, but honestly big expirings ain't what they used to be. You don't see them move very often any more. If you get stuck with Boozer and Gordon ends up opting out then you basically made yourself worse for nothing. Just because the Bulls have interest doesn't mean the Pelicans do.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram