Started By
Message

re: question for Bapple about the Kahr CW380 and CM9

Posted on 1/18/14 at 8:51 pm to
Posted by LSUlefty
Youngsville, LA
Member since Dec 2007
26497 posts
Posted on 1/18/14 at 8:51 pm to
is there anyway to justify the cost of the PM9 and P380 over the CM9 and CW380?
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11914 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

is there anyway to justify the cost of the PM9 and P380 over the CM9 and CW380?


For me, no. It's really just for the smoother lines and the extra magazine. I'm sure they sell a lot more of the CWs and CMs.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

Posted by LSULEFTY is there anyway to justify the cost of the PM9 and P380 over the CM9 and CW380?


My two cents is no, the pm not worth the extra money. Now the MK9 on the other hand....
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30493 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

is there anyway to justify the cost of the PM9 and P380 over the CM9 and CW380?



If you like "pretty" guns, then yes. Since the cm9 is a conceal gun. The no.

You get an extra mag w pm 9. Other than that, cm9 is what I eventually chose for the reasons of:
Conceal ability
P r I c e
Price
Weight
Size and
Oh. Price.


Can easily fit in pocket.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram