- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Winner of Black Rhino Hunt Auction Threatened
Posted on 1/17/14 at 9:29 am to Pettifogger
Posted on 1/17/14 at 9:29 am to Pettifogger
good point 
I'd actually like to see organizations like SCI or DSC control the tags and hunts. The hunt is sold through them and a license fee is paid to the governments involved. I trust SCI or DSC to spend the funds in the correct arena.
I am not an advocate of more regulations in this world. But, regulation through an organization like SCI would be a good thing for endangered species. They could control the funds, issue the permits, pay the scientists and governments. This would provide incentive to increase populations across the board.
I'd actually like to see organizations like SCI or DSC control the tags and hunts. The hunt is sold through them and a license fee is paid to the governments involved. I trust SCI or DSC to spend the funds in the correct arena.
I am not an advocate of more regulations in this world. But, regulation through an organization like SCI would be a good thing for endangered species. They could control the funds, issue the permits, pay the scientists and governments. This would provide incentive to increase populations across the board.
1
Posted on 1/17/14 at 9:41 am to DirtyMikeandtheBoys
Agree. I'm no fan of regulation either, although I don't disagree with some regulation for the protection of things we collectively enjoy (although obviously that is subject to abuse).
The best option is combining some degree of expansive regulation (animal protections, for example) with government/private collaboration to develop protected areas. Providing safe havens for delicate animal populations or ecosystems, especially when done with public-private collaboration, is something I can definitely get behind, as it may require less regulation applying to privately owned land. That too will ruffle some feathers (we all have opinions on Ducks Unlimited, Trout Unlimited, etc.) but I think it is still a good concept to pursue.
The best option is combining some degree of expansive regulation (animal protections, for example) with government/private collaboration to develop protected areas. Providing safe havens for delicate animal populations or ecosystems, especially when done with public-private collaboration, is something I can definitely get behind, as it may require less regulation applying to privately owned land. That too will ruffle some feathers (we all have opinions on Ducks Unlimited, Trout Unlimited, etc.) but I think it is still a good concept to pursue.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News