- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Winner of Black Rhino Hunt Auction Threatened
Posted on 1/17/14 at 9:02 am to Pettifogger
Posted on 1/17/14 at 9:02 am to Pettifogger
quote:
I just don't necessarily take the lofty intentions of African governments at face value.
That's just my point.
Without hunting the world is relying on lofty intentions to save the species. Well lofty intentions do not generate income, so corruption(which does generate income) occurs.
Once you introduce hunting the intentions become economic. It is smart economically to increase population to have the ability to sell more hunts. You move the $ transactions from corrupt hunts to a legal arena that can be priced, taxed, regulated.
Hunting removes the corruption.
Jim Shockey actually advocates hunting of South American jaguars to save the species for this very reason. The only reason the corruption exists is because there is no legal financial commodity assigned to these animals. People kill jaguars still. They pay less than they'd pay if it were legal, and none of the $ spent goes back into saving the species.
Posted on 1/17/14 at 9:18 am to DirtyMikeandtheBoys
Long term I think that is realistic.
Unfortunately, economic motivations in Africa haven't necessarily led to consistent regulation. The same is true for a number of other African natural resource trades. We all know how much external pressure African states get to regulate industries, so sometimes even the regulatory schemes that are implemented are deeply problematic (as they're just implemented to avoid the international pressure).
The theory isn't flawed, but it does rely on some measures of accountability and central oversight, which simply aren't present in many of these countries (or aren't sufficient). We're relying on fractured government factions to send the money to the right places, verify animals appropriate for harvesting, verify ivory, hides, etc. that are exported come from those harvested animals, whatever.
I think this is another conservation issue for hunters to really get out in front on. We all know about the conservation resources the hunting community provides, but we don't take enough credit it for it very often. Showing the value of these hunts, if combined with a simultaneous demand for transparency from those states, is the way to go IMO. No sense in letting hunters be the $$$ side while international/environmental organizations do the accountability if we can do all of it ourselves (and preempt our detractors).
Unfortunately, economic motivations in Africa haven't necessarily led to consistent regulation. The same is true for a number of other African natural resource trades. We all know how much external pressure African states get to regulate industries, so sometimes even the regulatory schemes that are implemented are deeply problematic (as they're just implemented to avoid the international pressure).
The theory isn't flawed, but it does rely on some measures of accountability and central oversight, which simply aren't present in many of these countries (or aren't sufficient). We're relying on fractured government factions to send the money to the right places, verify animals appropriate for harvesting, verify ivory, hides, etc. that are exported come from those harvested animals, whatever.
I think this is another conservation issue for hunters to really get out in front on. We all know about the conservation resources the hunting community provides, but we don't take enough credit it for it very often. Showing the value of these hunts, if combined with a simultaneous demand for transparency from those states, is the way to go IMO. No sense in letting hunters be the $$$ side while international/environmental organizations do the accountability if we can do all of it ourselves (and preempt our detractors).
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News