Started By
Message

Why The 2015 Ford F-150 Is Better For The Environment Than The Prius

Posted on 1/14/14 at 12:28 pm
Posted by saintforlife1
Member since Jul 2012
1321 posts
Posted on 1/14/14 at 12:28 pm
quote:

Getting into our example, Madowitz made the case that the rumored "3 MPG" increase in the new F-150 will result in less gas burned than the even a larger increase one would experience buying a Prius over a Corolla.

A 1 MPG increase is not equivalent to a 1 GPM decrease. Increasing the MPG of a vehicle that's already frugal on fuel doesn't reduce gas used over 500 miles by much. Meanwhile, an efficiency increase that's a smaller number in MPG but greater in terms of percentage of the original will reduce GPM substantially.

Imagine you're deciding whether to buy a Prius or a Corolla. The Corolla gets 30 MPG, the Prius gets 49 — 63% more. But if you're driving 500 miles, you only reduce gallons of gas burned by about 6.5 driving the Prius.

Madowitz focuses on two effects in this scenario: First, let's say you're deciding between a used 2013 F-150 that gets 14 MPG to a 2015 one that people are speculating will get 3 MPG better, bringing economy to 17. MPG would increase by 21%, but you burn about 6.3 fewer gallons of gas over 500 miles.


quote:

The second effect that comes into play is that many more F-150s are sold than hybrids. According to the data he found, it was about half a million vs 150,000 Prii. Madowitz went on to say it seemed like all hybrid and EV vehicle sales combine only became comparable to F-150 sales last year.

If the efficiency of a small group of vehicles is improved significantly, the total amount of fuel saved will still be less than if the consumption of a massive group of vehicles increases slightly.

For a more direct comparison, the 150,000 people who bought a Prius over a Corolla cut American oil consumption by some 670,000 barrels per year. If Ford hits the 3 MPG increase we heard about when the 2.7 EcoBoost was first being speculated on and F-150 sales remain consistent, US oil consumption would drop somewhere between 1.4 and 2.3 million barrels a year.




LINK


Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
38781 posts
Posted on 1/14/14 at 12:30 pm to
Why don't they make a hybrid F-150?
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 1/14/14 at 12:35 pm to
I don't follow. How is 17MPG better for the environment than 49MPG?
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85143 posts
Posted on 1/14/14 at 12:36 pm to
This does not compare the two things you claim it compares.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79357 posts
Posted on 1/14/14 at 12:37 pm to
Kind of a bunk study dude. Not comparing apples to apples.
Posted by CajunAlum Tiger Fan
The Great State of Louisiana
Member since Jan 2008
7880 posts
Posted on 1/14/14 at 12:40 pm to
Stellar reading comprehension in this thread.

Posted by MThawg
south
Member since May 2011
4458 posts
Posted on 1/14/14 at 12:42 pm to
Didn't go into the link but are they only using the ecoboost sales?
Posted by tigerstripedjacket
This side of the wall
Member since Sep 2011
3002 posts
Posted on 1/14/14 at 12:42 pm to
If you're just going to trust your superiors for their word, drop out now and come work for me. I'll pay you commission and per mile.
Posted by DonChowder
Sonoma County
Member since Dec 2012
9249 posts
Posted on 1/14/14 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Why The 2015 Ford F-150 Is Better For The Environment Than The Prius?


Less smug?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram