re: Self-proclaimed "radfem" attempts to explain how all hetero sex is rape

I remember reading a law review type article asserting that "all hetero sex is rape" back in the early 90's, and I want to say some potential Clinton appointee raised some eyebrows for identifying with this radically femnist point of view. Just saying that this form of wacko-ism has been around a long time, and only a tiny sliver of avowed feminists agree with it.

With views as bizarre as this one, I just apply the old adage that when one argues with a fool, the fool is doing the same thing.

And by teh way, I've read the OT enough to know that the blogger's description of "PIV" is far too narrow-minded!