- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/9/14 at 6:02 pm to jg8623
Ruth and Gehrig didn't get 100% vote.
Manning and Brady aren't Ruth and Gehrig.
They're more Barry Bonds and Sammy Sosa...not saying Manning and Brady juiced...but the game changed to favor and help and protect QBs like never before.
Montana and Unitas are Ruth and Gehrig.
Manning and Brady aren't Ruth and Gehrig.
They're more Barry Bonds and Sammy Sosa...not saying Manning and Brady juiced...but the game changed to favor and help and protect QBs like never before.
Montana and Unitas are Ruth and Gehrig.
Posted on 1/9/14 at 6:20 pm to jg8623
quote:
Care to explain why?
Sure. A 100% HOF vote for any player says, to me anyway, that HE was the greatest player to ever play whichever sport. No flaws, no failings. When in fact every player fails and has a flaw in their play.
100% vote is a herd mentality. There is a reason these halls have a %, to account for dissenting voices, which should be welcomed.
Nothing in reality is 100% and players getting a post career award aren't either. Brady/Manning are first ballot HOF'ers, doesn't mean that EVERY voter thinks or should think that way. Doesn't make them any less of a great player if one voter says no
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News