Started By
Message

re: Star Trek Voyager

Posted on 1/7/14 at 11:26 am to
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39737 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 11:26 am to
I enjoyed DS9 more mainly because of Garrick. He was one of the most compelling characters in the Trek universe. Avery Brooks high pitched whine when he is angry gets old. His son was Wesley like.

I like Voyager but only because of Phlox. Janeway was dull. Chokotay made her look exciting. He was one of the worst characters in Trek history only behind Wesley.

I guess I liked the plots more than the characters in Voyager.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89619 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 11:30 am to
quote:

I enjoyed DS9 more mainly because of Garrick.


Certainly Garrick is the best "minor" character - perhaps in all of Star Trek. The other "major" Cardassian, Gul Dukat, I have argued in the past, is the finest, most fully developed and 4-dimensional villain in science fiction history. How Mark Alaimo didn't get more accolades at the time is beyond me.

Great villains make for a great story.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/7/14 at 11:32 am to
quote:

I like Voyager but only because of Phlox. Janeway was dull. Chokotay made her look exciting. He was one of the worst characters in Trek history only behind Wesley.



Phlox was on Enterprise not Voyager. But he was a great character.

B'llana Torres, Tom Paris, Harry Kim, and The Doctor were all good characters that should have more of a role.

Janeway, Chokotay and Neelix all sucked.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram