Started By
Message
locked post

Panama Canal Expansion on Hold/DOE won't approve LNG exports

Posted on 1/3/14 at 9:32 am
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 9:32 am
Could seriously hinder the recovery IMO

LINK

quote:

those plans now could be jeopardized because of a dispute over cost overruns -- which means America's gas export dreams could be in jeopardy
quote:

The dispute could carry important consequences because the canal expansion has special importance for the United States, which hopes to start exporting natural gas, and Asia, which is desperate to buy it.


DOE is trying to muck it up too.

quote:

Clouds over the canal expansion aren't the only concerns about U.S. gas exports. There are also already worries about the slow pace of government approvals for new natural-gas export terminals, the multi-billion dollar projects that freeze gas to a liquid suitable for transport by ship. The Energy Department has received almost 30 applications to ship gas to countries with which the U.S. does not have a free-trade agreement; only five of those applications have been conditionally approved, and none will be operational until 2017 at the earliest. For projects further down the line, there is the very real worry that government approval won't come until the LNG market is already well supplied by rival countries.


I won't ever vote for her, but maybe Landrieu can get something positive done before she gets ousted.
quote:

LNG boosters, including Murkowski, may get extra help from across the aisle, if musical chairs in the Senate propel pro-export Louisiana Democrat Mary Landrieu to the top of the energy panel.


Should the US pick up the tab on the Canal cost overruns. It's a better investment than most things the FEDGOV spends our money on IMO.
This post was edited on 1/3/14 at 9:52 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99366 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 9:39 am to
If only we hadn't given the fricking canal to Panama in the first place.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
35052 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 9:42 am to
quote:

Could seriously hinder the recovery IMO


Obviously...you think they don't know that? Collapse of the Private Economy IS their plan, GT.

When the SOCIALIST take over Government...THEN, and only then...will we see policy that hopes to resurrect a vibrant economy. Impossible, of course.

Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54753 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 9:47 am to
Your link is to the wrong article...I keep getting an article about border crossing with Mexico post 9/11.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54753 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 9:52 am to
quote:

The Energy Department has received almost 30 applications to ship gas to countries with which the U.S. does not have a free-trade agreement; only five of those applications have been conditionally approved, and none will be operational until 2017 at the earliest. For projects further down the line, there is the very real worry that government approval won't come until the LNG market is already well supplied by rival countries.


First, none of these export facilities are coming online soon...there's a lot of time left for approval and the front runner in the game, Cheniere has approval.

Second, the biggest opponent to exports is US Mfg that are concerned about losing the cheap gas.

I'm not particularly worried...yet.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79395 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:53 am to
This is going to hurt TOTAL's vision of being the #2 in the world. 1.6B is surmountable however so not too much of a concern.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram