Started By
Message
locked post

Yankees: Why shop Brett Gardner?

Posted on 12/21/13 at 3:12 am
Posted by Dalosaqy
I can't quite re
Member since Dec 2007
12314 posts
Posted on 12/21/13 at 3:12 am
Here's a couple of reasons why not:

1. It's not about the money. Any notion of the Yankees sticking to a self-imposed salary cap in 2014 is already laughable and it's only December.

2. Gardner is a productive ball player. He hits well with RISP and is a monster on the base path (25 steals 2013). Above average OF with an above average arm.

3. If the Yankees need to trim the roster, why not move Wells and Ichiro, in that order. Very little downside IMO.

Remember the Russell Martin trade? In some ways, that was the beginning of the end for last year's season. No need to repeat that bonehead move with a proven performer like Gardner who will help get wins.

Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 12/21/13 at 6:36 am to
Well I agree, Gardner is a cheaper version of Ellsbury and this Ellsbury was not needed. But I'm high on Gardner...
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
28271 posts
Posted on 12/21/13 at 8:51 am to
quote:

3. If the Yankees need to trim the roster, why not move Wells and Ichiro, in that order. Very little downside IMO.


NY is only paying Wells like $2.5-million. Ichiro should go first.
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27881 posts
Posted on 12/21/13 at 9:03 am to
quote:

1. It's not about the money. Any notion of the Yankees sticking to a self-imposed salary cap in 2014 is already laughable and it's only December.

It is about the money. Assuming an arbiter holds up Arod's suspension, they have a good shot at being under the luxury tax line next year, which would bring their penalty down from 50% to something like 17%. Avoiding the repeater tax will be huge for the Yankees moving forward, so they definitely have some incentive to move Gardner.

quote:

3. If the Yankees need to trim the roster, why not move Wells and Ichiro, in that order. Very little downside IMO.

While I don't think they should trade Gardner, the other two guys can't be considered everyday guys at this point, so I doubt they'd get much for them. Gardner would at least net some reasonable talent.
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
28271 posts
Posted on 12/21/13 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Remember the Russell Martin trade?



No. I don't.

Dodgers non-tendered him.
NY signed him as a free agent.
Pittsburgh signed him as a free agent.
This post was edited on 12/21/13 at 9:32 am
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28114 posts
Posted on 12/21/13 at 10:33 am to
your answering your own question

Ichiro and wells have zero value, a bag of dirty balls is all your getting for them

Gardner is the piece that can get you a need, in return.
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 12/21/13 at 12:31 pm to
Current Yankee management reminds me of the Steinbrenner days circa 1984-1992
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram