- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Espn: Sizing up the SEC resumes
Posted on 12/16/13 at 5:48 pm to dante
Posted on 12/16/13 at 5:48 pm to dante
quote:
I disagree. LSU beat Bama on the road. OSU won the big 12 and only had 1 loss. Bama might have been better than OSU but OSU deserved the opportunity.
Correct.
The ulitmate goal is not to pitch the "two best teams" in a final game. Rather, it's to have one team that's demonstrated (that means on the field) superiority to the exclusion of the most number of other teams.
Posted on 12/16/13 at 5:57 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
The ulitmate goal is not to pitch the "two best teams" in a final game. Rather, it's to have one team that's demonstrated (that means on the field) superiority to the exclusion of the most number of other teams.
I don't understand the purpose of a rematch if there are other remotely plausible options.
This isn't a sport where you can do a best of three or five or seven. If you set up a rematch then you either have a useless result or an inconclusive one. You have a useless result if the team who won teh first time wins again. The game proved nothing not already shown by the first result. You have an inconclusive result if the team who lost the first game wins the second time. Now you need a best of three since you have a split.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News