- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: House renews ban on guns not detectable by metal detectors
Posted on 12/3/13 at 3:25 pm to Ace Midnight
Posted on 12/3/13 at 3:25 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
That's not true.
It is my understanding that if/when you build a receiver you are required to register it with the ATF. You have to have a federal license to legally manufacture a firearm. It isn't a firearm without a receiver. This is why you can buy parts kits without an FFL that contain everything but the receiver.
from the ATF FAQ:
Must a person who engages in the business of manufacturing and importing firearms have a separate license to cover each type of business?
Yes. A separate license is required to cover each of these types of businesses.
[27 CFR 478.41]
LINK
Unless of course you are talking about for your own personal use and not to be sold and a firearm outside the definition of the National Firearms Act.
Please explain where I am wrong. I am happy to be educated.
1
Posted on 12/3/13 at 3:50 pm to LSUnowhas2
quote:
Unless of course you are talking about for your own personal use and not to be sold and a firearm outside the definition of the National Firearms Act.
(ETA: And that's what is driving the 3D printing market - to make guns off the ATF's radar.)
This post was edited on 12/3/13 at 3:51 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News