- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Matt Flynn to Green Bay
Posted on 11/12/13 at 12:45 pm to ZZTIGERS
Posted on 11/12/13 at 12:45 pm to ZZTIGERS
Flynn had 2 good games in GB.
Leaves, gets beat out every where he goes.
Returns to GB.
Now, if he succeeds in Rodgers's absence, then maybe there is something to the system. That's all I'm saying.
Leaves, gets beat out every where he goes.
Returns to GB.
Now, if he succeeds in Rodgers's absence, then maybe there is something to the system. That's all I'm saying.
3
Posted on 11/12/13 at 12:47 pm to Sophandros
Brady gets criticized for the year of Cassel, Rodgers should get the same treatment.
Posted on 11/12/13 at 1:10 pm to Sophandros
But, Rodgers doesn't just do well in GB, he excels. In fact, he excels so well, that he's coming off the greatest 2 season stretch for a QB in NFL history. His career numbers are:
186 TDs
50 INTs
66% COMP
105 RAT
The way he protects the ball, and the throws he makes, alone make it obvious that he's not a system QB. Couple that with his numbers, I don't see how anyone can think he's a "system" QB.
186 TDs
50 INTs
66% COMP
105 RAT
The way he protects the ball, and the throws he makes, alone make it obvious that he's not a system QB. Couple that with his numbers, I don't see how anyone can think he's a "system" QB.
This post was edited on 11/12/13 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 11/12/13 at 3:37 pm to Sophandros
quote:
Now, if he succeeds in Rodgers's absence, then maybe there is something to the system. That's all I'm saying.
the odd thing is, it's not like he's played poorly. He's just too old to be a prospect and he has no real upside. But look at his numbers this year in two games and one start:
22/34, 64.7%, 246 yds, 7.24 Y/A, 83.7 RAT
Not elite, but not bad. Look at his rate stats. If he had enough attempts to qualify, he'd rank 6th in completion percentage, 16th in Y/A, and 18th in passer rating. He's essentially a mediocre starter in a market in which everyone is looking for either a high end starter or a project.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News