Started By
Message

re: Loston's "late hit"

Posted on 11/10/13 at 10:56 pm to
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38385 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 10:56 pm to
He was a defenseless player. It was targeting by the definition of the rule. I hate the rule, but that was the definition of the penalty.
Posted by LsuTigers80
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2013
309 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 10:57 pm to
Riseup did they call targeting? Nope. It was called a "late hit".
Posted by chinesebandit76
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
515 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 10:58 pm to
If he doesn't hit him and he gets away and runs for a td, then what would be said?
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60570 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 10:59 pm to
What exactly is a defenseless player? He was not down. He had already caught the ball. So what exactly made him defenseless?
Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
65411 posts
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:03 pm to
I suppose this thread popped up on your google search.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram