Started By
Message

re: Ben Lederman NYT article

Posted on 11/8/13 at 2:01 pm to
Posted by Tweezy
west of east
Member since Apr 2008
12157 posts
Posted on 11/8/13 at 2:01 pm to
Tactically, yes he would be very far behind. It's impossible to quantify exactly how much of his development would be hindered, but essentially he would be going from tactical instruction everyday at a young age, to not getting any tactical instruction until high school and even then it wouldn't be anywhere near the level of la masia. Obviously going over there doesn't make him any better of an athlete, so that part is moot. But the mental aspect of being a CM is really important, so I think if they really want to give their child the best chance to succeed then they made the right decision.
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
20758 posts
Posted on 11/8/13 at 2:20 pm to
That's such a hard to decision to make. Couldn't imagine having to think about that
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram