Started By
Message

re: Guns &Ammo editorial supports gun control

Posted on 11/7/13 at 7:15 am to
Posted by Yat27
Austin
Member since Nov 2010
8109 posts
Posted on 11/7/13 at 7:15 am to
I saw that. It's funny that the Brady Campaign has already jumped on Metcalf's comments to justify more regulation. Regardless, his article was by far the least offensive of the three mentioned.

Frick this guy.

quote:

I call them “assault” rifles, which may upset some people. Excuse me, maybe I’m a traditionalist, but I see no place for these weapons among our hunting fraternity. I’ll go so far as to call them “terrorist” rifles. They tell me that some companies are producing assault rifles that are “tackdrivers.” — Jim Zumbo
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11913 posts
Posted on 11/7/13 at 7:40 am to
quote:

It's funny that the Brady Campaign has already jumped on Metcalf's comments to justify more regulation.


This is why G&A took such swift action to get rid of him.

The magazine is political. It may seem like they just do gun reviews, but when you look on the cover and see a rifle, pistol, or shotgun, you realize it is still political.

Most of the writers are staunch 2A supporters, as they should be.

If you give the left one small concession like this, they jump on it like rabid dogs to try to divide our community. Some of the asinine comments I've read on the interwebz makes me believe they are succeeding.

If you read The Bang Switch blog post they made about it, you'll see that the Brady campaign has already hopped on those comments. They were extremely detrimental to the fight for 2A and G&A made the right decision.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram