Started By
Message

re: Guns &Ammo editorial supports gun control

Posted on 11/7/13 at 3:40 am to
Posted by subMOA
Komatipoort
Member since Jan 2010
1724 posts
Posted on 11/7/13 at 3:40 am to
Show me one place where he supports gun control. Not once does he call for additional regulation- not one time.

Seems to me he's supporting Illinois' 16 hour CC rule. We have an 8 hr. rule here- does that mean Bobby Jindal supports gun control?

Misleading thread title is misleading.

And LOL at the ignorance being spewed on their Facebook page. One of the most senior and respected gunwriters in the history of firearms writes an editorial about existing CC training laws and he's being burned at the stake.

This post was edited on 11/7/13 at 3:56 am
Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 11/7/13 at 6:22 am to
quote:

Show me one place where he supports gun control. Not once does he call for additional regulation- not one time.


"And I do believe their fellow citizens, by the specific language of the Second Amendment, have an equal right to enact regulatory laws requiring them to undergo adequate training and preparation for the responsibility for bearing arms."

I understand the point you are making but the simple fact is he does call for additional regulation and attempts to justify it by citing to the language of the Second Amendment. His entire article is a slippery slope argument, who decides what is "adequate training and preparation"? What he asks is for the government to oversee and give us permission to use the Bill of Rights once we have demonstrated we are responsible enough to have them. This is not a right, but a privilege, exactly like a driver's license - which he references.

The article also fundamentally misunderstands the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. They were drafted to place constraints upon the government, not the individual. He simply misunderstands that in our system of government we have three separate but equal branches, and the fact that the judiciary has, through case law over the last 200 years, established limits on constitutional protections does not mean that the founders intended for the rights to be so limited.

It boils down to one simple idea: your fundamental rights come from God, or your fundamental rights come from your government. Mr. Metcalf believes that they come from government and argues accordingly.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
14037 posts
Posted on 11/7/13 at 6:41 am to
He says that we need to get a drivers license to drive and that is a reason to require law abiding citizens to get a license to own a firearm!

In my book that is supporting gun control!!!

I think the thread title is right on. Calling for a requirement to get a license to own a firearm is without a doubt GUN CONTROL!
Posted by Coach in Waiting
Sixth Ward
Member since Oct 2009
601 posts
Posted on 11/7/13 at 3:55 pm to
"And I do believe their fellow citizens, by the specific language of the Second Ammendment, have an equal right to enact regulatory laws requiring them to undergo adequate training and preparation for the responsibility of bearing arms."

The person who wrote this is saying that the State has a right to regulate the bearing of arms. That could easily include within your own home. That is a wide open door to regulate all aspects of gun ownership.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram