Started By
Message

re: Houston Texans not looking to replace kicking failure R. Bullock

Posted on 11/6/13 at 11:13 am to
Posted by Jamohn
Das Boot
Member since Mar 2009
13544 posts
Posted on 11/6/13 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Don't give them that much credit. It took a Schaub injury to give Case a chance.
You don't think Schaub could've played in the KC game if Kubiak wanted him to?

Kubiak seized an opportunity for a no-lose situation to see what he had in Keenum. If he had to go back to Schaub, there wouldn't have been the stigma of being benched.

I really don't understand why they wouldn't bring back graham, who kicked well for them last year.
Posted by Haydo
DTX
Member since Jul 2011
2949 posts
Posted on 11/6/13 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

I really don't understand why they wouldn't bring back graham, who kicked well for them last year.




Obviously, he's better than RB. Hell, I'm better than Fat Randy. But Graham missed a TON of clutch FGs last year that he needed to make. I'd prefer Rackers over any of the three.

Also, I'm kind of starting to think that Kubiak really isn't an issue but that it was Schaub's limitations all along: zero mobility, not a big arm, etc.

Oh, and fire Marciano.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram