Started By
Message

re: ULM responds to UL debate

Posted on 11/4/13 at 11:30 am to
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21405 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 11:30 am to
So...let me get this straight.

ULM was the first school to jump on the "Louisiana" branding for athletics with Louisiana Indians. It never caught on, so they abandoned that strategy and went with "ULM".

UL-Lafayette then decides to go with "Louisiana Ragin Cajuns", and now the people in Moanroe (nothing to do up there other than West Monroe and ULM, which the latter no one attends, so plenty of time on their hands to bitch and moan) suddenly get their panties knotted up.

Got it now. Let's move on. Not worth our time.
Posted by bwallcubfan
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2007
38133 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 11:39 am to
quote:

ULM was the first school to jump on the "Louisiana" branding for athletics with Louisiana Indians. It never caught on, so they abandoned that strategy and went with "ULM".


I've never heard of that....which goes to show how hard we went at it...if that's even true.

Nobody I know is angry with being ULM and not Louisiana. If anything, we'd rather be NLU.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

UL-Lafayette then decides to go with "Louisiana Ragin Cajuns"
Sure, that's all ULL is trying to do.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram