Started By
Message

re: Is Bama the most unproven #1 team LSU has ever played?

Posted on 11/3/13 at 12:33 pm to
Posted by YStar
Member since Mar 2013
15210 posts
Posted on 11/3/13 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

It's called the transitive function for a reason.

Using that inane logic, since Bama beat Ole Miss 25-0, and LSU lost to Ole Miss by 3, the projected finish should be Bama by 28...no?

Good luck with that...


It's called reading comprehension and you lack it.

No where in that post did I say Alabama would beat LSU or that the results of those two games would play in any sort of factor. I specifically used the Ole Miss game to highlight your shortsightedness where you use injuries as an excuse for why teams on your schedule have bad records yet ignore the fact a team decimated by injuries has beaten LSU.

You can't have one then ignore the other.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76700 posts
Posted on 11/3/13 at 2:48 pm to
You're right, we can't excuse the ole miss loss. That was bad. And aTm is better than anyone LSU played so far, but lsu plays them soon. And Bama will play AU soon. So that's all good.

The bitch of it is playing UGA, SC, and Fla last two years of bridge schedule while Bama avoided all three. And every team having to accommodate Bama's pretend rivalry with Tenn that no one cares about.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram