Started By
Message

re: Is Bama the most unproven #1 team LSU has ever played?

Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:20 am to
Posted by tiger4178
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2008
1211 posts
Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Injuries also decimated Ole Miss, but they still beat LSU. Alabama on the other hand shut out a full strength Ole Miss side. Why is it you want to recognize the injuries of certain teams yet ignore the ones of another?


It's called the transitive function for a reason.

Using that inane logic, since Bama beat Ole Miss 25-0, and LSU lost to Ole Miss by 3, the projected finish should be Bama by 28...no?

Good luck with that...


Posted by YStar
Member since Mar 2013
15209 posts
Posted on 11/3/13 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

It's called the transitive function for a reason.

Using that inane logic, since Bama beat Ole Miss 25-0, and LSU lost to Ole Miss by 3, the projected finish should be Bama by 28...no?

Good luck with that...


It's called reading comprehension and you lack it.

No where in that post did I say Alabama would beat LSU or that the results of those two games would play in any sort of factor. I specifically used the Ole Miss game to highlight your shortsightedness where you use injuries as an excuse for why teams on your schedule have bad records yet ignore the fact a team decimated by injuries has beaten LSU.

You can't have one then ignore the other.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram