Started By
Message

re: Sam Montgomery Passes Drug Test

Posted on 10/24/13 at 11:22 am to
Posted by Texas ellessu
East Bank of Ward's Creek
Member since Dec 2007
517 posts
Posted on 10/24/13 at 11:22 am to
Yes, When people get in trouble with an employer's substance abuse policy, they often run out and get their own test to show they are not violating the policy. Employers almost always ignore them. The PA and the Owners agree to certain testing procedures. Anything else is only good for publicity. I don't think they wasted the time to test Sam and the others. I'm guessing they weren't smoking Arturo Fuentes. Probably some swisher sweets with the hole. Again, visual was a test. They failed, why complicate matters with a urine test?
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43218 posts
Posted on 10/24/13 at 11:34 am to
interesting
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 10/24/13 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Yes, When people get in trouble with an employer's substance abuse policy, they often run out and get their own test to show they are not violating the policy. Employers almost always ignore them. The PA and the Owners agree to certain testing procedures. Anything else is only good for publicity. I don't think they wasted the time to test Sam and the others. I'm guessing they weren't smoking Arturo Fuentes. Probably some swisher sweets with the hole. Again, visual was a test. They failed, why complicate matters with a urine test?




So what exactly is preventing coaches from "seeing" other unwanted players smoking weed?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram