Started By
Message

re: TUba Top 101 - including all games played through October 12th, 2013

Posted on 10/13/13 at 12:30 pm to
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 10/13/13 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

TubA, does your poll factor in location of the game?


No.

It might make sense to include a home field advantage .... but there aren't enough samples to get accurate numbers. Each team has a wildly different advantage at home from every other team, so each team would have to have its own HFA - and each game may have a differing HFA than the other (LSU v Bama for instance seems to have negative HFA for whoever is at home)

Also, including HFA would challenge the notion that the only thing matters is the win or the loss.
This post was edited on 10/13/13 at 12:32 pm
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 10/13/13 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Doesn't it affect the SOS if you're basing it only off of record?


By basing "only off record" I don't mean SOS isn't considered. SOS is in fact implicit in the formula used to calculate the ratings. what I mean is the only information the algorithm needs, for each team, the list of teams they played and the game result for each game.
This post was edited on 10/13/13 at 12:35 pm
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 10/13/13 at 12:35 pm to
quote:


Good lord that's retarded.

Why?
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83927 posts
Posted on 10/13/13 at 12:39 pm to
Shouldn't your rankings be affected by the home records of each team AND how many home games they have left?
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
31632 posts
Posted on 10/13/13 at 1:45 pm to
Where Harvard at? Not legit. (Still)
Posted by goldenbadger08
Sorting Out MSB BS Since 2011
Member since Oct 2011
37900 posts
Posted on 10/13/13 at 1:47 pm to
UW-Whitewater dropped out of the rankings after winning 55-13?
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160104 posts
Posted on 10/13/13 at 1:51 pm to
It's flawed because it's assuming that different levels of football are synonymous.


Let's say a team is 5-0 and they've played 5 teams who all have winning records but they have winning records against FCS teams.

Another team is 5-0 and they've played 5 teams who all have winning records against mid-level FBS teams.


Would your formula rate them pretty closely?
Posted by surprisewitness
Littleton, CO
Member since Apr 2013
556 posts
Posted on 10/13/13 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Here is the C++ code:
LINK

It is written for a Linux system. Probably can be modified easily for Windows.

It's c
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78357 posts
Posted on 10/13/13 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

5. Georgia 2882 4 2 0.667

Looks legit.
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 10/13/13 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

It's c

Oh shite, it is written in c. Why did he say it was c++ ?
Sounds like he is a fraud.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

It's flawed because it's assuming that different levels of football are synonymous.


You're assuming that the level classification of a team can actually influence their playing ability. If you took the LSU TIgers and classified them Div III they'd still be able to beat Florida.

Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 1:02 pm to
quote:


It's C


C is a subset of C++. If you try to compile a C code with a C++ compiler you will find no problems.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 1:03 pm to
quote:


Oh shite, it is written in c. Why did he say it was c++ ?
Sounds like he is a fraud.



Seriously, is this a joke? It is in C. It is also in C++. Every single element of C is also part of C++.

My fricking lord you're impossible to deal with.
Posted by Jelly
Chilling with Timmy Chang
Member since Oct 2010
225 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 2:12 pm to
Well being that there are scholarship limits and differences i'd say yes it does influence the quanity of quality players, then yeah.. I'd say it influences them. And why do you try to treat everything is in a vacuum when it isn't? Like HFA, Div of opponent etc etc.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47480 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

If you took the LSU TIgers and classified them Div III they'd still be able to beat Florida.


if you classified LSU as D3 they wouldn't have the same players dumbass
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

Well being that there are scholarship limits and differences i'd say yes it does influence the quanity of quality players, then yeah..


So you're saying if LSU played the same schedule and had the same results but had a Div III by their name, they would be less deserving.

Sorry, that makes no sense to me.


quote:

Like HFA, Div of opponent etc etc.



The division of the opponent is absolutely irrelevant. Only their on field results matter.

HFA is a problem. I've addressed this. See above.

Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 3:43 pm to
quote:



if you classified LSU as D3 they wouldn't have the same players dumbass


No shite Sherlock. You're missing the point. You don't get rewarded or punished because of the division you play in, you get rewarded or punished based solely on the results of your games and the results of your opponents games and the results of your opponents opponents games...
This post was edited on 10/15/13 at 3:45 pm
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160104 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 3:45 pm to
The point is that beating a mediocre FCS school is much different than beating a mediocre FBS school and your formula should account for that.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

The point is that beating a mediocre FCS school is much different than beating a mediocre FBS school and your formula should account for that.

OK. Maybe we should account for the quality of the uniforms, as well. The better teams tend to have the better quality uniforms. So obviously you should get more points for beating a team with better uniforms, right?
This post was edited on 10/15/13 at 3:47 pm
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160104 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 3:46 pm to
A victory over an FCS school should hold a weight of something around .60 or something similar.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram