Started By
Message

re: Dan Snyder says go pound sand if you want the name changed..

Posted on 10/9/13 at 5:21 pm to
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27326 posts
Posted on 10/9/13 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Nobody gets mad if you call a dolphin a dolphin. Do you call a Native American 'redskin?' Do you call an African American 'blacksin?' I don't really give a shite either way, but there would be plenty of uproar over blackskins, just sayin. Seems some get to pick and choose what's offensive. I'm from Jonesboro, AR, and Arkansas State dropped the Indians name, didn't really seem to upset anyone though, just trying to be pc.
At one time, colored was a perfectly acceptable word to describe a black person.

Now, people think that is a "racist" word.

Yet the NAACP, aka the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is still around with the same name.

Why don't they change the name since colored is a "racist" word? Because the organization was started when that was not a racist term.

Same with redskins. It was never racist until recently when people decided to make it racist.

It would be racist if you all of a sudden made a team called the "black skins" because that isn't a common word in our vernacular.
Posted by 2close2Gainesville
Huge
Member since Sep 2008
4795 posts
Posted on 10/9/13 at 5:33 pm to
I agree, it is ridiculous that people are selective on what is offensive. If Native Americans are happy with it, then who else is to say different? It's a double standard, though, in certain demographics. Being called whitey is ok, being called blackey is not, not just by black people but by sensitive white people. I don't give a shite either way, people are too damn sensitive nowadays.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram