- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Defending Ron Howard
Posted on 10/4/13 at 12:46 am to LoveThatMoney
Posted on 10/4/13 at 12:46 am to LoveThatMoney
quote:Absolutely yes.
They think guys like PTA
quote:Hell no.
or Malick are great directors
quote:Malick may be primarily a painter, but PTA is much more. PTA tells incredible stories and develops unforgettable characters; he has proven this time and again. The two are not even comparable IMO.
but they are painters more than anything.
1
Posted on 10/4/13 at 10:18 am to Patrick_Bateman
quote:
They think guys like PTA
Absolutely yes.
quote:
or Malick are great directors
Hell no.
quote:
but they are painters more than anything.
Malick may be primarily a painter, but PTA is much more. PTA tells incredible stories and develops unforgettable characters; he has proven this time and again. The two are not even comparable IMO.
Fair point. I would agree that PTA is better than Malick at telling a story, but I would stop before saying he is a great storyteller. He has great characters in his films, but his editing choices often make the movie feel disjointed. The Master, I think, is a prime example of this. I don't think he knew how he wanted to finish it, so he jumped to a time in the future and just ended it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News