Started By
Message

re: "Gravity" Tomatometer Thread: 215 Reviews, 98% Fresh

Posted on 10/5/13 at 4:06 pm to
Posted by DURANTULA
Member since Jun 2013
1885 posts
Posted on 10/5/13 at 4:06 pm to
This statement isn't going to be popular among some, but I'm going to say (well type) it anyways.

Avatar held up better going from theaters to tv than I see Gravity doing. Avatar wasn't just about the groundbreaking 3-D technology. It was full of absolutely gorgeous living environments (yeah yeah CGI, whatever) that are just as beautiful on tv as they were in cinemas.

I don't think the weightlessness will be there for Gravity. I also believe the tension will be gone as well. For all its faults, Avatar doesn't rely on the unknown for its thrills.

I have more to say on this, but I'll let that simmer for now.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 10/5/13 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Avatar wasn't just about the groundbreaking 3-D technology. It was full of absolutely gorgeous living environments (yeah yeah CGI, whatever) that are just as beautiful on tv as they were in cinemas.


Avatar had everything to do with the groundbreaking 3-D technology.

quote:

For all its faults, Avatar doesn't rely on the unknown for its thrills.


Some of the greatest movies of all-time rely on the unknown. Citizen Kane, considered by most to be the all-time greatest, had a mystery at the very center of its plot.
This post was edited on 10/5/13 at 4:21 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109147 posts
Posted on 10/5/13 at 4:30 pm to
I will agree to some extent, but as I said earlier in the thread, each film aimed to do certain things. James Cameron's goal of Avatar was not to make a movie, but to launch a new industry and make Hollywood tens of billions of dollars. James Cameron did actively plan for Avatar being on DVD, and by that I mean the 3-DVD. Each and every single part of Avatar was incredibly well thought out and calculating, even if those calculations drive me up the wall. Avatar from the start was intended to last decades so that they could make more 3-D movies and sell 3-D TVs.

Cuaron though, I think his only goal was to make the ultimate cinematic experience. He wanted you to come see this in IMAX and rock your balls off. I don't think Cuaron put much thought at all on it being a home release, since if he did, it would have detracted from the cinematic experience. Cuaron's goal was to make you feel as if you were literally trapped in space and wanted you to constantly clench your butthole and hold your breath. That's a difficult feeling to portray in the living room, since you are completely surrounded by well lit, comfortable, and familiar surroundings. When there was 10 minutes left in the film, I realized I even forgot about my drink and popcorn entirely, which was in my lap the whole time. That was how completely engaged in the environment I became is that I forgot I was not trapped in space with Bullock as well. It is why it is still a great film even if it won't translate as well to DVD: it set out everything that it set out to do to the audience. Simply put, it's incredible film making.
This post was edited on 10/5/13 at 4:52 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram