Started By
Message

re: Did we not already see this matchup back in 2011 LSU Oregon

Posted on 9/16/13 at 1:04 pm to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84378 posts
Posted on 9/16/13 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

This whole paragraph proves my point. 0-2 is meaningless, all it proves is that they didn't beat Auburn or LSU.


Seriously just STFU. This is an embarrassing quote for you. All we can go by is what actually happened. And all Oregon had done is lose to top SEC teams.

quote:

Either you don't understand the transitive property or irony. You are the one playing the transitive game by compariing LSU's 2013 passing output to 2011. The fact is both LSU and Oregon are completely different teams in 2013 than 2011, trying to draw meaning from that game and apply it to now is just silly.


More idiocy from you. You've done nothing but use the transitive property to say Oregon would beat top SEC teams. I said a top SEC team THAT HAS ALREADY BEATEN Oregon would do so again. Big difference.

quote:

Before JFF got that opprotunity many people said their O couldn't work against SEC defenses


No one knew who JFF was then you tard. No one knew what A&M had, including them. Seriously, do you even watch football?

ETA:

quote:

My point is that given the chance, Oregon COULD (not would or will for sure) but COULD do similar things to what A&M did last year in the SEC. If you deny that you are hopelessly biased.




ULL COULD do it too. Except they also have shite the bed against top SEC competition. Oregon has had opportunities, and has yet to do it with 2 of their supposed best ever teams. Until they actually win a game against good SEC teams, they don't get the benefit of the doubt. That's not bias you halfwit.
This post was edited on 9/16/13 at 1:07 pm
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59148 posts
Posted on 9/16/13 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Seriously just STFU. This is an embarrassing quote for you. All we can go by is what actually happened. And all Oregon had done is lose to top SEC teams.


No sorry, you don't understand statistics if you think a 2 game sample proves anything. LSU went 45 years without winning a NC, according to your logic, we could never win one.

quote:

More idiocy from you. You've done nothing but use the transitive property to say Oregon would beat top SEC teams.


This show you don't understand my argument and are just retrenching into an SECSECSEC type of argument. I said they COULD, not would COULD beat a top SEC team. I used examples to show why and to refute your claims, but you apparently can only take things literally. You find excuses for anything that doesn't support you view and attaching meaning to anything that does. There is a word for that, bias.


quote:

No one knew who JFF was then you tard. No one knew what A&M had, including them. Seriously, do you even watch football?


Think about what you are saying

No one knew who JFF was then and no one knows how 2013 Oregon would do against 2013 LSU, 2013 Alabama, 2013 UGA etc.

quote:

ULL COULD do it too. Except they also have shite the bed against top SEC competition.


No, ULL can't, they do not have the caliber of athletes that Oregon does. Have they ever beaten even an SEC bottom feeder 59-10? Or any of the other beat downs Oregon has laid on Tenn recently?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram