Started By
Message
locked post

Paying college athletes would only lead to more dirty money

Posted on 9/14/13 at 10:04 am
Posted by sgallo3
Dorne
Member since Sep 2008
24747 posts
Posted on 9/14/13 at 10:04 am
who disagrees with that?
Posted by massiveattack
CharLIT/Chapel Chill
Member since Oct 2010
11555 posts
Posted on 9/14/13 at 10:07 am to
no one
This post was edited on 9/14/13 at 10:08 am
Posted by wish i was tebow
The Golf Board
Member since Feb 2009
46122 posts
Posted on 9/14/13 at 10:09 am to
Most schools don't have the money to pay athletes. Very few do

You would have to branch off football from all other sports and still wouldn't have a ton of teams that made enough money to do
Posted by bayoubengal03
Member since Nov 2006
937 posts
Posted on 9/14/13 at 10:10 am to
Smart people

ETA: schools shouldn't pay but players should be able to profit from their name.
This post was edited on 9/14/13 at 10:12 am
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 9/14/13 at 10:13 am to
Doesn't matter. The NCAA and its members do not want to pay their students for participating in extra-curricular activities, and if it were important enough to the students that they get paid for doing so, they would form their own professional league for college-age athletes.
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 9/14/13 at 10:40 am to
i do in a way. i think giving stripends to college athletes would have little, in any effect on giving football and basketball stars the "$100 handshake" by well meaning jock sniffers. i'm plenty OK with giving college athletes what they used to get; it was called "laundry money" (having one's laundry done was commonplace in that era). it should be part of their scholarship and given because they really can't work a job. however, paying them big bucks is ludicrous. the damn nfl should have a minor league system for those that don't want to play for a college.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 9/14/13 at 10:43 am to
Depends on what you mean by paying college athletes. Giving a larger stipend? I agree. Letting them get as much money as people are willing to pay (which I am for)? I would disagree with you.
Posted by Bigsike
Member since Jan 2009
1382 posts
Posted on 9/14/13 at 10:54 am to
5 Reasons to not pay college athletics in no particular order

1. Title IX
2. Agents, Boosters, Shady friends of players etc will ruin it causing more regulation and higher expenses for everyone. Corruption will happen if athletes are allow to make money off signatures.
3. Uncle Sam- NFL athletes pay different taxes in different cities. This will open up the same tax burden on college athletes.
4. Jerseys Sales even for top athletes is not that much- Colleges get 10% royalties off sales. The Academic side of the University get the lions share leaving departments with 3% or so. 3% of $1million is $30k. Athletic department needs their cut. How is the athlete going to get $10,000? Give $4,000 to Uncle Sam. Is this really worth it?
5. Entitlement mentality- Do this and you will continue to add to the mentality in this country. I need, I am supposed to get, this is what I'm entitled too because I have dreads, cool Mohawk, ran for a 125 yards in a big game.

Athletes get paid through an education, meals, housing, training, first class experience etc. If you want to end this allow any athlete out of high school to go pro when they want. If you want to go to college play by the rules or go try to get paid in the pros.

End of story. This will ruin college football if it happens. The out for blood media types don't have a plan and don't know the implications of allowing this.
Posted by monz29
Castle Pines, CO
Member since Dec 2006
918 posts
Posted on 9/14/13 at 10:57 am to
It would be so much worse off if they were paid to play. Wealthy schools would win every year, smaller schools would never compete. Even if they gave them a stipend of say 10K/year, there would still be under the table money so the system would be no better off. Would you pay woman's basketball players as well. Does the starting QB make as much as the back up long snapper? Kids would be sitting out over money disputes. Yeah, great idea to pay players......
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28114 posts
Posted on 9/14/13 at 11:25 am to
of course, the rich would get richer.

it would be a contest between who's boosters have the most cash.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram