Started By
Message

re: Runningback Degression

Posted on 9/4/13 at 7:42 pm to
Posted by VesperiaLSU
Baton Rouge Tigerland
Member since Sep 2010
1239 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 7:42 pm to
Ignore thoses replies that called you dumb as they are just being smartazz or too dumb themselves to notice the obvious issue. Ever since Ridley, our RBs all tend to be most productive during their first year, and then just become average and inevitably get passed by younger backs. Strictly speaking, that applies to Ridley as well as he only had a one-year production at LSU and then went pro. Ware, Hilliard, Ford all regressed somehow after their spectacular showcase as a freshman. That being said, I don't believe the regression should be attributed to bad coaching. Instead, I think it's just a lack of effort and focus, and being complacent after successes come so easily, while in the meantime the younger guys have more hunger and motivation to prove themselves. We will see if Hill can break the trend after he makes it back on the field but you are definitely not the only one who notices this.
This post was edited on 9/4/13 at 7:46 pm
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 9/4/13 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

Ware, Hilliard, Ford all regressed somehow after their spectacular showcase as a freshman.


Ware's production was basically the same from 2011 to 2012, except that his # of carries dropped (b/c we had a better running back). His receiving greatly improved. We also had a better oline in 2011.

Hilliard's YPC went up from 2011 to 2012

Ford's YPC dropped from 2011 to 2012 from 6 ypc to 5.5 ypc. He received less touches.

not really seeing it
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram