Started By
Message

re: Analysis of Cam's offense vs Jim Caldwell's for Ravens

Posted on 9/2/13 at 11:59 am to
Posted by Tiger Voodoo
Champs 03 07 09 11(fack) 19!!!
Member since Mar 2007
21788 posts
Posted on 9/2/13 at 11:59 am to
quote:

The main point of this article is that Cam prefers to work the seams to the sidelines, while Caldwell is more focused on thei middle of the field.



I had edited my post to include this:


Cherry picking two games that illustrate his point, including one against Pittsburgh, which had one of the best defense over the middle (think that has anything to do with why they didn't attack the middle??) is a fricking horrible attempt to pretend to have done some valid analysis. Maybe the match ups were better on the outside. Maybe Cam called middle routes and Flacco or the receivers adjusted their routes based on what the defense was doing??

Not to mention Pitt, Houston, and SD all had top 10 defenses last year while NE wasn't even top 20. Hell NE was 29th in pass D.


That is a terrible, contrived article where the writer is doing everything he can to create a narrative.

I wonder how long it took him to pick the two games for each OC before he got those patterns on his stupid arse note pad that he could use to prove the point he was trying to make.
This post was edited on 9/2/13 at 12:36 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram