Started By
Message

re: NFL settles with former players! 765 MILLION

Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:36 pm to
Posted by saintsfan92612
Taiwan
Member since Oct 2008
28896 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

One of the principle terms of the settlement is that the agreement "cannot be considered, an admission by the NFL of liability, or an admission that plaintiffs' injuries were caused by football."




LINK
Posted by Hoodoo Man
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:39 pm to
We're giving you money for your injuries.
But football didn't cause the injuries.

Gotcha.
Posted by kclsufan
Show Me
Member since Jun 2008
12092 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

quote:
One of the principle terms of the settlement is that the agreement "cannot be considered, an admission by the NFL of liability, or an admission that plaintiffs' injuries were caused by football."


That's actually pretty standard language in a lot settlements. If the NFL admitted liability it could possibly be used against them in future litigation.

This post was edited on 8/29/13 at 1:42 pm
Posted by Farva
Member since May 2009
789 posts
Posted on 8/29/13 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

One of the principle terms of the settlement is that the agreement "cannot be considered, an admission by the NFL of liability, or an admission that plaintiffs' injuries were caused by football.


This is indeed common language in most releases, however future litigants are not bound by the agreement.

So players who sue in the future can likely point to the settlement as an admission, unless otherwise barred by an evidentiary rule.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram