- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trade Proposed - Take or Say No? UPDATE: League Vetoed Trade
Posted on 8/26/13 at 11:58 am to ShoeBang
Posted on 8/26/13 at 11:58 am to ShoeBang
I got the names of the people who voted against the trade. 5 people.
They all said The Wilson for McFadden was the part that made it unfair. Said I was raping the guy by giving him mcfadden for wilson.
But I was giving him a top 3 TE and a top 5 DEF and a serviceable backup wideout too in return for Wilson and Amendola (who is already hurt)
They all said The Wilson for McFadden was the part that made it unfair. Said I was raping the guy by giving him mcfadden for wilson.
But I was giving him a top 3 TE and a top 5 DEF and a serviceable backup wideout too in return for Wilson and Amendola (who is already hurt)
1
Posted on 8/26/13 at 12:02 pm to ShoeBang
Wilson can be seen as just as much of a risk as McFadden, just in a slightly different way. Wilson has no proven production, fumble issues, and a split backfield that adds to competition. This is in no way a clear trade rape.
ETA: You shouldn't veto trades just because you think it might wind up a bad deal for one of the people. Run your own damn team.
ETA: You shouldn't veto trades just because you think it might wind up a bad deal for one of the people. Run your own damn team.
This post was edited on 8/26/13 at 12:04 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News