re: 2011 Alternative Scenario

It's a fact that Oklahoma St beat more ranked teams than Bama beat teams with a winning record. bama beat 3 teams above .500 and OK St beat 5 ranked teams.
Again, the bcs says nothing to do with the two best teams. It's says #1 vs. # 2 and every single years , except 2011 those #1 &#2 are decided by resume. Never has, mattered more than who you beat when the resume's at that far apart. I've been watching CFB religiously for 25 years and I've never once seem resume disregarded for the ,EYEBALL TEST. Never.
Also on 11/5 4 OF Bama's 5 missed fgs would've been career highs for your kicker. 40+ fgs are made 65% BY PRO KICKERS. To suggest that 40 + yard fgs are automatic points left off the board is laughable. From the beginning of the second quarter until the end of the game, LSU OUTGAINED Bama's offense. Bama made it inside LSU's 20 ONE TIME. ONCE. LSU WAS INSIDE YOUR 10 twice. You also say LSU's points were from Bama mistakes, but never mention that every single one of Bama's points came from JLee firing the ball directly into a Bama's defender's gut, yet this were forced by Bama and Bama's turnovers were from Bama mistakes, not because of LSU's defense. Lets just forget that in overtime, LSU's defense pushed Bama's offense backwards and into a long fg while LSU was a shoe string from scoring on a 20 yard option.


You're dumb for thinking Bama deserved to be in that game. That graphic you dismissed showed that every single state believed OSU should've been there.