- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2011 Alternative Scenario
Posted on 7/30/13 at 3:52 pm to Tiger Voodoo
Posted on 7/30/13 at 3:52 pm to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
You lost me there with "the way a champion should". Must I bring up 2003 and 2007 LSU? While you didn't get a rematch in either title game, you most certainly did not control your destiny from start to finis Obviously. But the difference is that Alabama did NOTHING after their loss to earn their way back in to the game. LSU certainly did in 03 and 07, and so did OSU. LSU also had the most impressive wins in the country in 07 as well. OSU beat the best team on their schedule in the final game by five touchdowns to win their conference while Alabama sat at home. Was the Arkansas win in SEPTEMBER truly so overwhelming as to overshadow a win like OSUs over an Oklahoma team just as good as Arkansas?? And I admitted Alabama was better than LSU, but that's in hindsight after 1/9. I certainly wouldn't have accepted that in December. But the media had already annointed Bama as the better team despite the scoreboard. Alabama got the same benefit of the doubt that OU did in 03 after losing their last game. A benefit that the media was so outraged by they broke off from the BCS and split the title. LSU was coincidentally, and infuriatingly, the victim in both of those cases. It leads many of us to feel like a media whipping boy from time to time, and I challenge any fanbase to say they wouldn't feel the same
Best description of what happened that I have ever seen.
Agree completely.
I will never accept Alabama's championship in 2011 as legitimate based on the system that was in place. They got a do-over and the made the most of it. Lots of teams could have done that throughout the years.
LSU should have played a new opponent - a conference champion. Not a division runner-up.
Posted on 7/30/13 at 3:59 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
LSU should have played a new opponent - a conference champion. Not an SECW runner-up.
FIFY
It would have been bad enough to have to face a non champion from another conference that had not even made it to it's own conference championship game...but to have to face a team from within it's own DIVISION after beating that same team in their own damn yard when everyone assumed that game meant everything?
Come on...
Posted on 7/30/13 at 4:01 pm to AlaTiger
Might as well not accept the overwhelming majority of past national championships then.
I don't think the 4-team playoff will make things much better. Conference championship games can introduce a team that didn't even win it's division into the playoff over the division winner. See last year. Alabama defeated Georgia, and Florida got the Sugar Bowl bid and the higher ranking. If we had a playoff last year, would you be okay with Florida getting the nod over the SEC Championship game loser?
I don't think the 4-team playoff will make things much better. Conference championship games can introduce a team that didn't even win it's division into the playoff over the division winner. See last year. Alabama defeated Georgia, and Florida got the Sugar Bowl bid and the higher ranking. If we had a playoff last year, would you be okay with Florida getting the nod over the SEC Championship game loser?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News