- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: what if Tyrann Mathieu was 6'2 225 like Patrick Peterson?
Posted on 7/28/13 at 2:26 am to TigerTerez0307
Posted on 7/28/13 at 2:26 am to TigerTerez0307
PP7 was still and still is vastly superior in coverage. TM gave up way more than pp7 ever did. Dont get me wrong, loved both these tigers. But Tyrann isnt in the same level as Peterson. And its not because size, its just Petersons natural ability is better than most.
6
Posted on 7/28/13 at 2:29 am to ShadyTiger182
what if god was one of us?
Posted on 7/28/13 at 2:41 am to ShadyTiger182
quote:
PP7 was still and still is vastly superior in coverage. TM gave up way more than pp7 ever did. Dont get me wrong, loved both these tigers. But Tyrann isnt in the same level as Peterson. And its not because size, its just Petersons natural ability is better than most.
I think Mathieu could have improved on his coverage skills with another year. Thing is, he's more of a short Polomalu. He's a playmaker and more of a safety than a corner. He could play nickel corner though during obvious pass plays.
Posted on 7/28/13 at 2:43 am to ShadyTiger182
quote:
PP7 was still and still is vastly superior in coverage. TM gave up way more than pp7 ever did.
Vastly overestimated belief. Mathieu was not the liability in coverage people make him out to be and Peterson wasn't that much better than him. You're trying to make it seem like Peterson has a doctorate degree and Mathieu has a GED. While Peterson is better, he's not vastly superior over Mathieu. If Mathieu was 6 foot 220 pounds like Peterson we wouldn't even have this debate. That's how good Mathieu is.
Posted on 7/28/13 at 3:05 am to ShadyTiger182
quote:
PP7 was still and still is vastly superior in coverage. TM gave up way more than pp7 ever did. Dont get me wrong, loved both these tigers. But Tyrann isnt in the same level as Peterson. And its not because size, its just Petersons natural ability is better than most.
Tm didn't give a td his last year. Penn st wr clowned PP along w other receivers
Posted on 7/28/13 at 7:49 am to ShadyTiger182
quote:
TM gave up way more than pp7 ever did
uh...no he absolutely did not
Posted on 7/28/13 at 7:55 am to ShadyTiger182
quote:
PP7 was still and still is vastly superior in coverage. TM gave up way more than pp7 ever did. Dont get me wrong, loved both these tigers. But Tyrann isnt in the same level as Peterson. And its not because size, its just Petersons natural ability is better than most.
This is a myth that will never die. TM7 was brilliant in coverage. The two things that make PP7 better are height and top end speed. TM7 is just as strong and a little quicker.
Definitely TM7 gave up more completions than PP7, but you have to factor in that a considerable number of the times they completed a pass against him TM7 took the ball away from the receiver.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News