Started By
Message

re: Great read on why paying college athletes would NOT be doomsday

Posted on 7/26/13 at 10:51 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423392 posts
Posted on 7/26/13 at 10:51 am to
quote:

I don't value amateurism at all. It is an outdated concept dating back to 19th century gentlemen. They valued amateurism because it demonstrated they did not work. It was inherently elitist and completely inapplicable to a student athlete. The question is, should the courts continue to value amateurism as a valid concern?

i agree with this

but there is so much shite federal law that it makes directly paying players an albatross (ignoring the economic reality of the entirety of the college sports spectrum)

Title 9 is the biggest issue

Anti-trust legislation is another (but in avoiding that, they've created the false reality that you referenced above)

hell, this fricking class action is based on shitty law (essentially a contract of adhesion)

it makes this difficult to create real, rational changes to the system to get away from the false reality that both you and i acknowledge exists.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 7/26/13 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Title 9 is the biggest issue

Sure, and you can sidestep it pretty easily: either give all players a stipend a few thousnad bucks (which would eliminate about 90% of NCAA corruption -- most players just want some walking around money) OR more drastically, remove all restrictions on players receiving compensation from boosters. So long as the institution isn't directing payment, who cares?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram