- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Levee authority to bring suit against 100 O&G companies regarding wetland loss
Posted on 7/24/13 at 12:00 am
Posted on 7/24/13 at 12:00 am
LINK
great Lens article
this is going to be a huge battle. the levee board is going in armed with study after study after study and nearly every coastal scientist on their side. there is no doubt O&G activities have contributed to erosion and subsidence, but i think the levee board will greatly be burdened to prove the extent. the oil and gas companies will undoubtedly argue that the Miss River levees impeded natural sediment deposition and were the primary cause of land loss as well as excavation of navigation channels such as MRGO, HNC, and so on.
as a neutral observer, i think this could be desperation on the part of the levee board to figure out how to afford the operation and maintenance costs of the new 17 billion dollar system they now have. it also could be a real turning point in the effort to fund large scale coastal restoration if they win. i don't think we would see a wholesale departure of oil and gas companies from the state since most heavy exploration has shifted to deep water rather than the marshes in question.
great Lens article
this is going to be a huge battle. the levee board is going in armed with study after study after study and nearly every coastal scientist on their side. there is no doubt O&G activities have contributed to erosion and subsidence, but i think the levee board will greatly be burdened to prove the extent. the oil and gas companies will undoubtedly argue that the Miss River levees impeded natural sediment deposition and were the primary cause of land loss as well as excavation of navigation channels such as MRGO, HNC, and so on.
as a neutral observer, i think this could be desperation on the part of the levee board to figure out how to afford the operation and maintenance costs of the new 17 billion dollar system they now have. it also could be a real turning point in the effort to fund large scale coastal restoration if they win. i don't think we would see a wholesale departure of oil and gas companies from the state since most heavy exploration has shifted to deep water rather than the marshes in question.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 12:34 am to man in the stadium
Texas has already enjoyed getting O&G business from Louisiana. This may help get them some more business.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:14 am to man in the stadium
Don't bite the hand that feeds you IMO. Plus i feel that the Army Corps of Engineers has done more to speed coastal erosion than oil and gas companies. When they blocked the flow of fresh water from the MS river from entering south east LA they killed the coastal parishes. Just look at a map of the wetlands between the Atchafalaya and MS Rivers.
Posted on 7/24/13 at 8:46 am to man in the stadium
I wonder if they are even a proper party to bring this?
Posted on 7/24/13 at 3:24 pm to man in the stadium
This will be interesting to see how it plays out. The state permitted the land use/access so at first glance it doesn't seem as though the levee boards have much of a case. But hey lawyers need to work too...
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News