Started By
Message

re: Anybody else think the B1G messed up the new divisions set to begin in 2014?

Posted on 7/16/13 at 10:12 pm to
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 7/16/13 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

It sounds counter intuitive, but I'd argue that its better to have all thew dominant powers in 1 division in that case. In this set up only 1 of those 3 can play in the CCG in any given year. If you split them up, aren't they more likely to face each other in the CCG? Use the Big 12 as an example. Texas and OU more or less dominated the conference since 2000. If they were in different divisions, they would have played in the CCG in 2000, 03, 04, 06, and possibly 08 depending on what division TTU was in. KSU won the Big 12 CG in 2003, other than that either UT or OU won anyway ever year after that.. At least by them being in different divisions, KSU did win one and Mizzo, CU and NU all got to at least play for the title.
This makes sense, but the divisions are more balanced than most are realizing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram