Started By
Message

re: Jeremy Hill pleads Guilty to Simple Battery

Posted on 7/12/13 at 10:29 am to
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70563 posts
Posted on 7/12/13 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Yes they would. It's SOP when someone on probation fricks up that they revoke the probation.


So they do it in every single case, every single time?
Posted by TigersRuleTheEarth
Laffy
Member since Jan 2007
28643 posts
Posted on 7/12/13 at 10:30 am to
quote:

So they do it in every single case, every single time?


I don't know, but it's common.
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143616 posts
Posted on 7/12/13 at 10:30 am to
They will review it probably every time but they don't have to revoke it. And they won't here.
Posted by charate
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2012
195 posts
Posted on 7/12/13 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

So they do it in every single case, every single time?


Da requests revocation every time a defendant receives new charges. A condition of all probation is "to refrain from any and all other criminal conduct"

They usually continue the revocation until the new charges have a disposition. At that point Judge will usually tell the lawyers what his thought is on revocation. If the judge doesnt want to revoke, then the defendant just stipulates to the violation, receives some form of probation increase (extension, special conditions such as anger management of drug testing), and recieves a one time 402 or "technical violation"

this should happen in this case. I doubt Hill pled this early after charges were officially filed without already knowing he wouldnt be revoked in the original case.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram