- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jeremy Hill pleads Guilty to Simple Battery
Posted on 7/12/13 at 10:29 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
Posted on 7/12/13 at 10:29 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
quote:
Yes they would. It's SOP when someone on probation fricks up that they revoke the probation.
So they do it in every single case, every single time?
Posted on 7/12/13 at 10:30 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
So they do it in every single case, every single time?
I don't know, but it's common.
Posted on 7/12/13 at 10:30 am to ProjectP2294
They will review it probably every time but they don't have to revoke it. And they won't here.
Posted on 7/12/13 at 3:07 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
So they do it in every single case, every single time?
Da requests revocation every time a defendant receives new charges. A condition of all probation is "to refrain from any and all other criminal conduct"
They usually continue the revocation until the new charges have a disposition. At that point Judge will usually tell the lawyers what his thought is on revocation. If the judge doesnt want to revoke, then the defendant just stipulates to the violation, receives some form of probation increase (extension, special conditions such as anger management of drug testing), and recieves a one time 402 or "technical violation"
this should happen in this case. I doubt Hill pled this early after charges were officially filed without already knowing he wouldnt be revoked in the original case.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News