Started By
Message

re: Blue vs Hill

Posted on 7/10/13 at 11:22 am to
Posted by Prominentwon
LSU, McNeese St. Fan
Member since Jan 2005
93768 posts
Posted on 7/10/13 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Blue > JHill


Agreed.

But there will be people that fight to the death about this because of the "Blue hasn't ran well against good competition."



If Blue stays healthy, dude's a fricking beast. Smoothest runner I've seen in a long time.
Posted by Tigerbait357
Member since Jun 2011
67950 posts
Posted on 7/10/13 at 11:32 am to
Blue is one of the most balanced backs we've had in a while. People don't give him enough credit
Posted by Purpleandgold2
Texas
Member since Jul 2013
272 posts
Posted on 7/10/13 at 11:38 am to
I'm not sure why this is on the recruiting board but NOT criticizing the topic which is a good one. Obviously MY opinions and comparisons:

There is a reason Houston Nutt (Ole Miss then) wanted Blue desperately. He is the reincarnation of Dexter McCluster and the McCallum guy at Ark. I think Houston Nutt is overrated as a recruiter and coach, but his judgments of RBs...second to none! Blue is shifty and faster than you think and find holes. Hill is more the Cecil Collins type with both power and speed and shifty enough.

Both RBs have something that was woefully lacking in Spencer Ware, Charles Scott, K Williams, Ford, and every other back since Hester left...that is the ability to "run to daylight". I like Blue WHEN 100% a little better than Hill but obviously either is a high caliber SEC starting RB. I honestly didn't think that way about C Scott or K Williams who too many times "ran into the pile" at the LOS instead of stepping 3 feet to the side where the hole ended up being.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram